banner

January 30

2024

Updates

The Difference Between Conventional and Shariah Based Asset Management

In today’s dynamic financial landscape, investors are increasingly exploring diverse asset management options that align not only with their financial goals but also with their ethical and religious values. Among these, Islamic Asset Management has emerged as a distinctive and fast-growing segment, offering a Shariah-compliant alternative to Conventional Asset Management.


While both aim to optimize returns and manage risk, the principles guiding them diverge significantly. Here's a closer look at the key differences between conventional and Islamic asset management.


1. Guiding Principles

Conventional Asset Management is driven purely by financial performance metrics. The primary objective is to maximize returns relative to risk, using any legal financial instruments available in the market, regardless of the industry or underlying assets.


Islamic Asset Management, on the other hand, adheres to the principles of Shariah law, which emphasizes ethical investing, risk sharing, and social justice. Investment decisions are screened for compliance with Islamic teachings, focusing not only on profitability but also on moral responsibility.


2. Permissible Investments (Halal vs. Haram)

Islamic asset managers must avoid investing in industries or activities considered haram (forbidden), such as:

  • Alcohol
  • Gambling
  • Interest-based financial services (e.g., conventional banks)
  • Pork-related products
  • Weapons or arms manufacturing


Conventional asset management does not impose such restrictions, and portfolios may include stocks and bonds from any legal sector or enterprise.


3. Use of Interest (Riba)

One of the fundamental differences lies in the treatment of riba (interest).


  • Conventional finance widely uses interest-bearing instruments like bonds, savings accounts, and fixed-income products to generate predictable returns.
  • Islamic finance strictly prohibits interest, viewing it as exploitative. Instead, Shariah-compliant portfolios utilize profit-sharing instruments (such as Mudarabah and Musharakah) or trade-based financing (such as Murabaha and Ijara).


4. Risk and Profit Sharing

Islamic asset management encourages a risk-sharing approach. This is based on the idea that both the investor and the investee should share in the risks and rewards of the investment.

In contrast, conventional asset management often allows risk transfer, where one party bears the risk while another earns a fixed return, such as in interest-based loans or guaranteed bonds.


5. Ethical and Social Responsibility

While many conventional asset managers now incorporate ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) factors, it is not always a central requirement.

Islamic asset management inherently incorporates ethical guidelines, emphasizing fairness, transparency, and social responsibility. For example, investments must not only be profitable but also beneficial (or at least not harmful) to society.


6. Shariah Governance and Compliance

Every Islamic asset management fund is overseen by a Shariah Supervisory Board (SSB)—a group of Islamic scholars who ensure that investments comply with Islamic law. The fund undergoes regular audits to maintain compliance.

Conventional funds are typically governed by regulatory authorities (e.g., SEC, FCA) and do not require religious or ethical oversight.


Final Thoughts


Both conventional and Islamic asset management offer valuable strategies for building and preserving wealth. However, for investors seeking to align their financial goals with their faith or ethical values, Islamic asset management provides a compelling, principled approach.

As global awareness and demand for ethical investing grow, Islamic finance is likely to play an increasingly prominent role in shaping the future of asset management.